How could we Close Gaps in Water Access: Hydro-Climatic Regimes, Uncertainties, and Atrocities in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive, integrated analysis of the severe and escalating water crisis in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The investigation aimed to identify and connect the key drivers of the crisis: the region’s hydro-climatic regimes, the uncertainties introduced by climate change, and the atrocities of water infrastructure destruction in armed conflicts. By synthesizing existing research and data, the study sought to detail the multifaceted nature of water scarcity and propose a holistic set of policy, technological, and governance-based measures to close critical gaps in water access.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The study employed a desk-based research methodology, utilizing a comprehensive literature review and secondary data synthesis. This approach integrated findings from reports and databases from leading international organizations, including the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and the World Resources Institute (WRI). The analysis drew on case studies from key countries like Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and Egypt to demonstrate the real-world impacts of water scarcity, climate shocks, and conflict, providing a qualitative and quantitative foundation for the findings and recommendations.
Findings: The investigation found that the MENA water crisis is a convergence of physical scarcity exacerbated by unsustainable practices like groundwater over-extraction and saltwater intrusion; geopolitical tensions over transboundary rivers; and climate change, which intensifies droughts and contributes to mass displacement and social unrest. Crucially, the study identified the systematic destruction and weaponization of water infrastructure in conflicts, which has created severe humanitarian crises and fueled the spread of waterborne diseases in war-torn areas.
Research Limitation/Implication: The primary limitation of this study is its reliance on secondary data, which can vary in timeliness and granularity. The rapidly evolving nature of regional conflicts and climate patterns also implies that findings must be continuously updated. This research, however, provides a robust framework and highlights the urgent need for continuous, on-the-ground monitoring and in-depth, site-specific investigations to develop more granular and tailored mitigation strategies.
Practical Implication: The study offers direct, actionable guidance for policymakers and international organizations. It advocates for strengthening transboundary water agreements, investing in climate-resilient and secure water infrastructure, and adopting advanced technologies like desalination and wastewater recycling powered by renewable energy. The findings underscore the necessity of protecting water infrastructure under international law and engaging local communities to ensure the durability and equity of future water management systems.
Originality/Value: This work offers significant value by providing an original, integrated framework that connects the physical, climatic, and political dimensions of the MENA water crisis. Its originality lies in its holistic synthesis of these disparate factors, moving beyond single-issue analyses to create a comprehensive baseline for evidence-based policymaking and informing sustainable development strategies tailored to the region’s unique and compounding challenges.

